Trump Is Confronting the Hidden Empire Behind the Atlantic Alliance

The British Empire did not die, it evolved from colonial rule into financial control.

Its core is the City of London, a sovereign financial enclave that:

1. operates outside normal British law
2. dominates global banking, insurance, commodities, and derivatives
3. coordinates offshore tax havens and shadow finance
4. exerts power through debt, credit, and currency control

This is the Rothschild model: empire without colonies, rule by finance instead of force.

The Federal Reserve, Bretton Woods institutions, global central banking norms, and so-called “free trade” regimes all reflect this model:

1. debt-based money
2. perpetual interest extraction
3. financialisation over production
4. unelected technocratic control

President Trump is dismantling decades of imperial control that have undermined American sovereignty, industry, and independence. Let’s look at how:

1. The Greenland Gambit (Direct UK–Atlantic Fracture)

• Greenland sits inside the UK–NATO–Atlantic security architecture
• Denmark functions as an extension of British-aligned European policy
• U.S. interest in Greenland bypasses both Brussels and London

When Trump frames Greenland as a U.S. strategic asset, he is:
– challenging NATO’s assumed territorial coherence
– weakening British maritime and Arctic influence
– asserting direct American hemispheric control

That is imperial disentanglement.

2. NATO Tension

Under Trump, NATO is no longer sacred, it is treated as what it is: a negotiable contract.

Trump has reminded us of this by making repeated threats to defund or exit, by making public accusations that allies exploit U.S. taxpayers and by showing his willingness to let NATO fracture rather than submit

Remember historically, NATO has preserved British post-imperial relevance and it has embedded UK strategic priorities into U.S. defence planning

Trump has reframed NATO as a constraint on U.S. sovereignty, not a guarantor of it.

3. Housing, Banking, and the City of London

Trump’s move on housing and mortgage bonds is critical.

Instead of subsidies or money printing, he has pushed for U.S.-controlled mortgage giants to use their large cash reserves to buy mortgage-backed securities.

The effect is simple:

1. higher demand for mortgage bonds
2. downward pressure on mortgage rates
3. lower monthly payments for Americans

No new debt, no central-bank stimulus and no global banks skimming the spread.

By bypassing global finance and using domestic credit levers, Trump is attacking the Anglo-financial model, not markets themselves. That is a direct threat to London-centric finance.

4.Military Language and Symbolism Matters

The renaming of the Department of Defence as the Department of War matters because after 1947, the U.S. military was turned into a manager of global order, instead a defender of U.S. sovereignty. Re-emphasising war, borders, enemies, and national interest signals a focus on U.S. autonomy over alliance maintenance.

5.Trump vs Powell

Trump’s confrontation with Jerome Powell is another front in the same war; a direct challenge to the Rothschilds system where money is created privately and elected governments answer to bondholders and banks.

Before NATO, before the so-called “special relationship,” the U.S. military openly identified Britain as a strategic rival, particularly as an imperial power exerting control through finance and maritime dominance. That understanding wasn’t wrong, it was simply made inconvenient.

But watch Trump’s actions:

1. tariffs over global free trade
2. manufacturing over financial speculation
3. bilateral deals over multilateral governance
4. hostility toward NATO bureaucracy
5. attacks on housing and credit manipulation

This is Trump sticking a very deliberate middle finger to the British Empire / Rothschild banking cabal that has kept the world enslaved through debt for far too long.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

---

Back in 2018, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado wrote a letter directly to Benjamin Netanyahu and Mauricio Macri, urging them to push the UN into taking “protective measures” against Venezuela’s government. On paper it sounded diplomatic, but between the lines, it read like a plea for foreign intervention, calling the Maduro government a “criminal regime linked to terrorism and drug trafficking.”

Then, two years later, in 2020, her party Vente Venezuela formalised a cooperation agreement with Israel’s Likud party, Netanyahu’s own political arm, pledging collaboration on “strategy, geopolitics, and security.”

A Venezuelan politician, marketed by Western media as the “democratic alternative,” aligning herself not just ideologically but institutionally with the same machinery behind Israel’s most aggressive and expansionist policies.

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel