👆👆

Just to add some substance Patriots, this post is more than just bellicose social media rhetoric … it is a historic Statement from the President of the Nation, and its military’s Chief Commander, during a crucial junction in American political destiny.

It is the required Presidential Proclamation found at 10 USC 334 before the Insurrection Act’s lawfulness can supersede status quo restraints imposed by the Posse Comitatus Act.

“Proclamation to Disperse” | 10 USC 334 👈

Exactly who must disperse? And how expansively will that network of groups/individuals/organizations be viewed under the law, if they do not disperse?

10 USC 334 operative terms: “insurgents” ; “those obstructing the enforcement of the laws”.

INSURGENT: “Insurgency can be defined as ‘the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify, or challenge political control of a region’. INSURGENTS seek to subvert or displace the government and 👉 completely or partially control the resources and population of a given territory 👈. They do so through the use of force (including guerrilla warfare, terrorism and coercion/intimidation), propaganda, subversion, and 👉 political mobilization 👈. Insurgents fight government forces only to the extent needed to achieve their political aims. Their main effort is not to kill counterinsurgents, but rather to establish a competitive system of control over the population, 👉 making it impossible for the government to administer its territory and people 👈. Insurgent activity is therefore designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control and influence. INSURGENTS require supporters, recruits, 👉 safe havens, money, supplies, weapons and intelligence on government actions 👈. A robust insurgency can be waged with the 👉 support of just a small percentage of a given population 👈”

THOSE OBSTRUCTING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS: United States v. Aguilar (1995) — Addressed whether 👉 making false statements to prospective witnesses 👈 could “constitute obstruction of a grand jury proceeding”, 👉 affirming such conduct CAN BE PROSECUTED 👈.

Didn’t Tim Walz just publish a video of himself to his official public servant X Account, wherein he made a litany of false statements to 👉 INSURGENTS on the ground 👈 in Minnesota, and elsewhere, AND to any/all ‘prospective Minnesota witnesses’ who might be called upon to testify in future grand jury proceedings?

Nevermind 18 U.S. Code § 373 “Solicitation to commit a crime of violence”, and 18 U.S. Code § 2101 “Incitement to Riots”.

For now, let’s focus only upon the articulation of the lawful language in the Insurrection Act itself. When we do that, we can plainly see that the written-text-conditions/problems laid out in Section 334 have now been satisfied.

10 USC 332, two sections prior to 334: “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it 👉 impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings 👈, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as 👉 he 👈 👉 considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion 👈”.

Once the Act is invoked, the President is empowered with 👉 sole discretionary authority 👈 as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, to determine how much of the National Guard, and the regular armed forces, are necessary to enforce the laws and/or suppress the rebellion.

Insurrection Act [articulated definition of problematic circumstances]: Now Satisfied.
Insurrection Act [articulated requirements of Presidential Proclamation Issuance]: Now Satisfied.
Insurrection Act [‘violations’ by elected officials]: Now Documented.

It is literally all systems go now in the eyes of the Law, with one holdout: Because the President’s “Proclamation to Disperse” was issued after the ‘violations’ of the Act by an elected official occurred (in this case MN Governor Walz), the President must now give the “Insurgents”/”Those Obstructing the Enforcement of the Laws” the opportunity to cure, and actually disperse.

If they do not, the President is now good and green, by a matter of visible, documented, public record and manifestly apparent public communications, to invoke the Insurrection Act, adopt sole discretionary Powers as Commander in Chief, and suppress insurrectionist activities in 👉 any of the Several States 👈 with the full force of the United States military.

We are that close.

~SG

---

For those asking why Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act yet, the answer is always PUBLIC PERCEPTION.

POTUS is legally within his Constitutional authority to invoke the Insurrection Act unilaterally. Giving the order is the easy part.

Convincing hundreds of millions of Americans that we need to send the US MIL into US cities nationwide to help deport millions of illegal aliens that the Dems are using to steal elections… that’s the hard part.

Trump has been teasing the Insurrection Act for months for a reason. It was soft disclosure. He was softening the landing for when the time comes. The public needed to be psychologically prepped before undertaking something of this magnitude, especially considering the Dems/MSM have been telling their sheep that Trump is Hitler, ICE are the Gestapo, etc.

This is an extremely delicate situation, and one false step could be catastrophic. This must be done surgically, without causing a full-on civil war with unfathomable civilian casualties.

It must be clean and swift, and the public must be downloaded on why it is happening BEFORE it happens.

POTUS will do it when the time is right, and when the public are psychologically prepared to what must happen.

~ BioClandestine (@WarClandestine on X)