Flat Earth is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of the Earth’s shape as a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat-Earth cosmography.
The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in ancient Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). However, most pre-Socratics (6th–5th century BC) retained the flat-Earth model. In the early 4th century BC, Plato wrote about a spherical Earth. By about 330 BC, his former student Aristotle had provided strong empirical evidence for a spherical Earth. Knowledge of the Earth’s global shape gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world. By the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view was widely held, with some notable exceptions.
This video is not intended to offend anyone. But I do believe this flat earth debunk video might open some peoples eyes as to how our world operates. Flat Earth is a subject I dont care to speak about but since I seem to always have encounters with flat earthers on my posts from my dear friends, I just decided to make my most powerful argument in this video to show scientific observations of the constellation Octans seen from 5 different country’s at the same time on opposite sides of the flat earth model in the south..(which is an impossibility if the Earth was flat. The so called flat earth proof videos are so funny to me because they lack common sense and scientific observation. This video I made will debunk flat earth rhetoric once and for all.
They’re popping up in conspiracy/political forums, every 9/11 youtube comment section, and just about everything else that the government has a vested interest in marginalizing or discrediting.
They’re Flat earthers, and they’re spreading like the plague. Flat earth is like the 21 jump street of the conspiracy world. These people are the equivalent of undercover cops playa hating on the cool kids selling weed. Unfortunately, thanks to usury and unlimited ZOG bucks, we have hit levels of government sanctioned player hatred that shouldn’t even be possible. (Source)
“Conspiracy Theories” and government infiltration (Source)
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled “Conspiracy Theories”, dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from “cascades” of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote, “The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be.” They go on to propose that, “the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”, where they suggest, among other tactics, “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.” They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as “extremist groups”. The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: “We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.” However, the authors advocate that each “instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5).”
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting “nongovernmental officials”; they suggest that “government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes,” further warning that “too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed.” Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, “might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts.” This position has been criticized by some commentators who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens. Sunstein and Vermeule’s proposed infiltrations have also been met by sharply critical scholarly responses.
This concerns the brain-washed people defending the “flat earth” psyop created by the CIA to dumb down the populations, distract and cause division. No matter how many facts you present to them, they are groomed to defend this nonsense quite aggressively. Best is not to engage, for the fool is deaf. ~ Elena Danaan
Notes to Readers:
Flat Earth and other psyops were designed to discredit anti-government or official narratives pushed by the Deep State. These psyops were perpetrated by the Central Intelligence Agency and were/are associated with discrediting anyone who speaks up against the official narratives… calling them a “conspiracy theorist”…
What is somewhat hilarious to me is the gullibility of the people who accept such strange notions as being truth without making much effort to really prove the validity of their claims. I’ve encountered comments from Flat Earth believers that are… well, let’s say they got swiftly taken down and deleted by me. This was on Telegram. Are these people government paid shills and trolls? I don’t know other than I am not going to tolerate being attacked, hence one of the reasons I seldom allow comments on this blog any more.
Elena Danaan also addresses the topic of Flat Earth on her lengthy “Debunk” page:
“Flat Earth is a psychological experiment elaborated by the CIA in order to distract and dumb down the population.” (Source)
I would suggest that the CIA knew what they were doing and there is a growing and divisive group of rabid believers in this archaic concept.
Note the word, “distract”, in the sentence above… which is the primary motive of the various psyops put out by the Central Intelligence Agency — which itself is not American, but an intelligence arm of the Deep State, and run by the Khazarian Mafia from Israel. The roots of evil run deep inside the U.S. gov’t.
I recommend all my readers to read what is on Elena’s “Debunk” page.
Personally, I had some involvement with at least three of the debunked psyops: 1) the Galactic Federation of Light, and 2) The Jerusalem Ship, and 3) Commander Ashtar. I released these beliefs during the Covid lockdowns… and have since realized the errors of my ways… really how easy it is for even someone as awake as I have been to fall for such nonsense. I did question a lot of what I was being told, incessantly, and irritated my mentor to the point that she began changing some of her narrative, which made me question things even more, to the point of tossing off the whole thing…
Still, it wasn’t until I started listening to Elena’s work and reading Alex Collier’s works that I completely broke out of the daydream effect of the alien AI black goo.
Flat Earth is bunk. Period. If you want to argue the point, take it elsewhere. And the Ice Wall in Game of Thrones is fiction. Fiction. Made up by a brilliant author who was using Europe and the Middle East politics as his inspiration.
Eliza Ayres, https://sunnysjournal.com
P.S. How do you believe in Flat Earth when a relatively isolated African peoples knew about Sirius C before our astronomers did? They had contact, physical contact with benevolent ETs, long, long ago.